<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tristan Watkins on IT Infrastructure &#187; IPv4 Archive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tristanwatkins.com/index.php/tag/ipv4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tristanwatkins.com</link>
	<description>Technical guidance for SharePoint, Cloud Services, Windows and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 23:33:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Conflicting guidance on IPv6</title>
		<link>http://tristanwatkins.com/index.php/conflicting-guidance-on-ipv6/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=conflicting-guidance-on-ipv6</link>
		<comments>http://tristanwatkins.com/index.php/conflicting-guidance-on-ipv6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Watkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SharePoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cable Guy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyper-V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPv4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPv6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tristanwatkins.com/?p=187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently noticed that Cable Guy is saying &#8220;don&#8217;t disable IPv6&#8220;. While I broadly agree with the approach and the reasons he suggests not to, I&#8217;ve not yet seen any down-side to disabling it, and I know we aren&#8217;t using the IPv6 technologies that Cable Guy mentions. But why did I turn it off? SharePoint&#8217;s Hyper-V performance [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently noticed that Cable Guy is saying &#8220;<a title="Cable Guy says don't disable IPv6" href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/2009.07.cableguy.aspx" target="_blank">don&#8217;t disable IPv6</a>&#8220;. While I broadly agree with the approach and the reasons he suggests not to, I&#8217;ve not yet seen any down-side to disabling it, and I know we aren&#8217;t using the IPv6 technologies that Cable Guy mentions. But why did I turn it off? <a title="SharePoint Performance and Capacity recommendations for Hyper-V" href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd277865.aspx" target="_blank">SharePoint&#8217;s Hyper-V performance and capacity guidance</a> suggests that performance is improved by disabling it.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;<strong>Use IPv4 as the network protocol for Hyper-V guests.</strong> During the tests, better performance was observed when IPv4 was used exclusively. IPv6 was disabled on each network card for both the Hyper-V host and its guest VMs.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>In this case, I&#8217;m going with the SharePoint guys, especially when there&#8217;s a quantified test versus a theory, especially when it simplifies troubleshooting and not everyone is IPv6-fluent yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tristanwatkins.com/index.php/conflicting-guidance-on-ipv6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

